Decision O2018_004
Decision as PDF | O2018_004.pdf |
Number of proceeding | O2018_004 |
Decision date | 14.12.2020 |
Type of proceeding | Main proceeding |
Type of decision | Final decision |
Status | appeal(s) dismissed by the Federal Court, res iudicata |
Link Federal Court | Urteil Bundesgericht 4A_265/2021 vom 27.10.2021 |
Judges |
Dr. iur. Andri Hess Dr. sc. nat. ETH Tobias Bremi lic. iur. Lara Dorigo |
Clerks |
lic. iur. Susanne Anderhalden |
Lawyers |
Dr. iur. Michael Ritscher M.A. HSG in Law and Economics Louisa Galbraith Dr. iur. Ralph Schlosser |
Patent attorneys |
Werner A. Roshardt Stephan Kessler Dr. Regula Rüedi Christoph Engelbrecht Dr. Zacharias Stelzer |
Key word
Laserflüssigkeitsstrahllenkungsverfahren. Haupt-/Widerklage Patentverletzung/Patentnichtigkeit abgewiesen; Widerklage Verletzung UWG gutgeheissen; Teilverzicht nach abgeschlossenem Schriftenwechsel/Rechtsschutzinteresse
Subject
- Inventive step
- Person skilled in the art
- Specialist judge's opinion
- Costs: Court costs
- Costs: Representation costs
- Capacity to be made a defendant
- Novelty
- Territorial jurisdiction, national
- Unfair competition (UCA)
- Impermissible modification (art. 123(2) EPC)
Technical field
- IPC-B Performing operations, transporting