Decision O2019_012
| Decision as PDF | O2019_012.pdf |
| Number of proceeding | O2019_012 |
| Decision date | 30.08.2021 |
| Type of proceeding | Main proceeding |
| Type of decision | Final decision |
| Status | appeal(s) dismissed by the Federal Court, res iudicata |
| Link Federal Court | Urteil Bundesgericht 4A_511/2021 vom 11.02.2022 |
| Judges |
Dr. iur. Mark Schweizer Dr. sc. techn. ETH, Dipl. El.-Ing. ETH Markus A. Müller-Kägi Dr. iur. Daniel M. Alder Dr. iur., Dipl. sc. nat. ETH Stefan Kohler Dr. phil. nat., Dipl. Phys. Philipp Rüfenacht |
| Clerks |
lic. iur. Susanne Anderhalden |
| Lawyers |
Dr. iur. Thierry Calame lic. iur. Peter Ling Dr. iur. Andri Hess MLaw Luca Angstmann |
| Patent attorneys |
Dr. Michael Wallinger Hans Rudolf Gachnang |
Key word
Gutheissung Verletzungsklage nach Einschränkung inter partes
Subject
- Person skilled in the art
- Specialist judge's opinion
- Costs: Court costs
- Costs: Representation costs
- Novelty
- Territorial jurisdiction, international
- Patent claims, interpretation
- Nullity of patent, defense
- Accounting, auditing and reporting
- Prayers for relief
- Partial nullity
- Impermissible modification (art. 123(2) EPC)
Technical field
- IPC-B Performing operations, transporting