Decision O2015_011
| Decision as PDF | O2015_011.pdf |
| Number of proceeding | O2015_011 |
| Decision date | 29.08.2017 |
| Type of proceeding | Main proceeding |
| Type of decision | Final decision |
| Status | appeal(s) partly approved by the Federal Court |
| Link Federal Court | Urteil Bundesgericht 4A_541/2017 vom 08.05.2018 |
| Judges |
Dr. iur. Dieter Brändle Dr. sc. nat., Dipl. Chem. Hannes Spillmann Dr. iur. Daniel M. Alder Dr. rer. nat., Dipl. Chem. Hanny Kjellsaa-Berger Dipl. Natw. ETH Prisca von Ballmoos |
| Clerks |
lic. iur. Susanne Anderhalden |
| Lawyers |
Dr. iur. Thierry Calame lic. iur. Lara Dorigo Dr. iur. Michael Ritscher Dr. iur. Mark Schweizer Dr. iur. Kilian Schärli |
| Patent attorneys |
Joseph Schmitz Dr. Thorsten Bausch |
Key word
Gutheissung Nichtigkeitsklage
Subject
- Inventive step
- Person skilled in the art
- Specialist judge's opinion
- Action for a declaratory judgment
- Costs: Representation costs
- Lugano Convention
- Novelty
- Territorial jurisdiction, international
- Suspension of proceedings upon application by the parties
- Impermissible modification (art. 123(2) EPC)
Technical field
- IPC-A Human necessities (incl. pharmaceuticals)